NYTIP INSIDER – could conceding cuomo’s airtrain conceive a chance?

On this edition of the NYTIP INSIDER, I explore a controversial topic – the proposed LaGuardia Airport (LGA) AirTrain. If you’ve read my SAS/LGA extension post, you know that I strongly prefer a subway extension. However, I must consider the very real possibility that Governor Cuomo gets what he wants regarding this AirTrain. If it gets built, what does that mean for NYTIP?

According to the LGA Draft EIS, the so-called preferred alternative is Alternative 9A – an AirTrain from Mets – Willets Point station on the 7 line to LGA with two airport stations. This alternative routes the LGA AirTrain over the Flushing Promenade – a curious choice of alignment, given the extant 10-lane asthmaway next to said promenade. In contrast, the JFK AirTrain mostly traverses the Van Wyck Asthmaway’s median.

Disrupting green space to protect a highway seems antithetical to New York State’s supposed climate goals, but I digress.

I want to approach this from two angles – both of which assume LGA AirTrain gets built in some form. First, can we realize an AirTrain that maximizes transit connectivity? Second, is there still a case for extending the Astoria El if it doesn’t go to LGA?

A Better LGA AirTrain

If an LGA AirTrain must be built, then combine Alternatives 9B and 9N – respectively, the Grand Central Parkway (GCP) alignment and the connection to Astoria Boulevard station:

[Fig. 1] Modified LGA AirTrain alignment.

From LGA Central Hall to Willets Point, the modified alignment is the same as the preferred alternative, except it traverses the GCP instead of the Flushing Promenade. Given that airport construction is already disrupting traffic to some extent, I don’t buy traffic disruption as an excuse for rejecting the GCP alignment. West of LGA Central Hall, the extended AirTrain continues to follow the GCP to the Astoria Boulevard subway station. To avoid conflicts with LGA’s Runway 4, the AirTrain runs underground for a short distance; consequently, the Ditmars Boulevard station – which serves several car rental facilities – is underground.

This alignment would make the LGA AirTrain much more useful than the so-called “preferred alternative”.

Astoria El Extension

If the LGA AirTrain gets built as shown in Figure 1, the Astoria El need not go to LGA. However, there is another corridor that warrants a subway extension – Northern Boulevard.

Here is what an Astoria El extension via Northern Boulevard could look like:

[Fig. 2] Astoria El extension via Astoria and Northern Boulevards.

The extension includes a new rail yard inside the Con Edison property north of Ditmars Boulevard station; the yard leads meet the Astoria El at grade. I envision three tracks from Ditmars Boulevard to Union Street, then two tracks from thence; this requires converting Ditmars Boulevard to side platforms to extend the existing center track. I envision storage tracks east of Union Street – Town Hall station to allow short turns.

On the three-track segment, the 82nd Street and Union Street – Town Hall stations have island platforms, while the rest have side platforms except Mets – Seaver Way. At Seaver Way, the three tracks fan out into five tracks with two island platforms and a center bypass track; thus, the station behaves as an express stop on event days and as a local stop on other days. On the two-track segment, all stations would have a single island platform.

I would not want to extend the R this way, however, because the resulting line becomes too long. However, the extended Astoria line has significant potential when paired with other investments, which I will discuss in future posts.


As you can see, conceding a LaGuardia AirTrain wouldn’t derail NYTIP. However, this doesn’t mean we should concede the existing plan for said AirTrain. There is still time, given that the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) isn’t out yet, to realize something better.

For New York’s sake, I hope it’s not too late.

2 thoughts on “NYTIP INSIDER – could conceding cuomo’s airtrain conceive a chance?

  1. You do make a worthy point with this post. Should money be wasted on an AirTrain, it could still serve secondary connections to transit while the subway extension that should’ve happened could still serve as the primary, direct, high-capacity route to the airport.

    I still think that should money be wasted on an AirTrain (I’ll bite this one time 😛), one branch must go to Jackson Heights, even if the other still goes to Willets Point. IMO Jackson Heights is the single best way to maximize transit connections, and we could put those Q70 buses to better use on other routes.

    Redundancy is great for transit! Now that’s three rail methods to LGA or whatever would be in its spot if the state really cared about climate and closed the airport and replaced it with something else. (I expect humans to be creative enough to find a way to integrate the brand new terminals into whatever they want. Without planes, it’s just a lot of flat surface down there. Make use of it!)

    1. Jackson Heights works too! It’s a major transit hub. Whether your approach or mine, both are better than the current Backwards AirTrain plan.

      That said, I’m not opposed to closing LGA entirely. The South Bronx – among other areas – could use a lot less air pollution, not to mention the opportunities the land LGA sits on could present after detoxification. Of course, a lot has to happen to make this possible, such as improving local airports like Long Island MacArthur (LIMA), Republic, and Westchester (HPN) to split LGA’s load. (I imagine you can’t add much more at JFK or EWR.) Republic and LIMA abut the LIRR Ronkonkoma branch, retaining connectivity to the city proper. Lots to think about!

discuss respectfully!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.